Hor and English Language Changes


Text A, written by Edward Berens, is an excerpt from a series of ten letters that were written from an uncle to his nephew in 1832, meaning that it features lexis and language choice from the present modern English language period. Though the letters were written just a little under 200 years ago, language change can still be seen between 1832 and today. Being that Text A is a collection of letters written by Berens to his nephew, it shows language change simply because of the form of the text being a letter. Letters are not used as often today due to technological advances that have been made since then, which shows an example of how the English language has changed over time.


A couple of semantic changes can be seen throughout Text A. For instance, Edward Berens utilizes the word inmates to refer to people living in the same home. Today, one would likely not utilize the word inmate to refer to someone living in the same home, rather they would likely refer to them as a roommate or something of the like. Inmate has broadened since then, and not only refers to ‘an occupant of a house,’ but also to ‘one who is confined to an institution such as a jail, prison, or a hospital.’ Additionally, the word intimate was used by Berens to describe “two intimate friends” when discussing interest in the letter. Since these letters were written, intimate has also undergone semantic broadening and now has another meaning. In this letter, the word refers to someone who is ‘closely acquainted’ to Berens’ nephew. Today, intimate also refers to something that is ‘personal’ and ‘private.’ These two words have since broadened to have new meanings since they were used in the early days of today’s modern English period.


In Text B, a collocate chart exemplifies synonyms of the words taste and judgment, which also happen to highlight semantic changes between the meaning of the words then, and the meaning of the words now. The British National Corpus recorded these collocations between the 1980s-1993. Similar to Text A, the collocate chart shows data taken within the current modern English period. According to the chart, the word taste was often used alongside words such as ‘bitter’ and ‘good,’ which shows that taste had a negative connotation and a positive connotation during this time period. Furthermore, the word judgment was often used alongside words such as ‘professional’ and ‘dissenting.’ This shows that, similar to taste, judgment had a negative connotation and positive connotation as well. It is apparent in Text A that Edward Berens is discussing the positive connotations of the words taste and judgment as he tells his nephew to “take care that you never are guilty of such a violation of good taste and correct judgment.” Here, he is telling his nephew to ensure that he is always making good decisions as he is going into college.


Text C is an n-gram which illustrates the changes in usage over time of the phrases are apt to be, are likely to be, and tend to be between the years 1800 to 2008. Once again, similar to Texts A and B, the n-gram highlights data that is within the current modern English language period. The phrase, are apt to be, translates to ‘having a tendency to be.’ When looking at the n-gram, it is apparent that the phrase are apt to be has remained at a relatively constant and low level of usage during the time period. However, this is not the case with the other two. Are likely to be, expresses a probable action. For example, one would say something ‘certain fruits are likely to be ripe during the Spring season,’ to express a probable occurrence. When looking at the n-gram, it is apparent that between 1800 and around 1920, the phrase remained at a relatively constant level of usage. It was around 1920 when the phrase experienced an increase in usage, and continued to do so through 2008. Moreover, the phrase tend to be refers to being ‘likely to be,’ similar to the phrase are likely to be. This can be said due to the fact that both phrases experience a similar increase in usage over time. Like the prior phrase, tend to be remains at a relatively constant level between the years 1800 to 1920, where it then begins to increase in usage and continues to do so throughout the remainder of the time period. It can be said that the change in usage of these three phrases over time can be defined by WIlliam Labov’s Substratum Theory. Labov’s theory suggests that language changes due to spreading and the influence of other Englishes. It can be inferred that are apt to be likely originated in European English where it then spread and led to the now often used tend to be instead.


It should also be noted that Text A demonstrates grammatical and syntactical features that were prevalent during the time in which it was written. For example, Edward Berens opens his letter by telling his nephew; “You will, I am sure…” Today, these are shortened to create a contraction of you’ll and I’m. Similarly, Berens does this throughout the rest of the text as well, showcasing even further how the English language has changed over time.

Comments

  1. You had a very good introduction that allowed a brief discussion of the ‘text as a whole’ just as the model essay did. Your mentioning of letters not being used as often today due to ‘technological advances’ was very beneficial to showing language change. I would like to point out that your second paragraph was very effective and showed your detailed understanding of the text. You made very good use of the word ‘inmates’ and really show how the text uses it. You do this by describing how the word is used and compare it to the way the author uses it. I also really like how you connected the word to the overall meaning of the text. You state that today, ‘inmate’ is referring to something ‘personal’ and ‘private’ and how that relates to the letter also being of the such. Your introductions to both text B and C are very effective. You also made very good use of the words from text B to show how Berens uses them in text A. In positive regard to your n-gram evaluation, I think you did a really good job explaining what the phrase changes are and the specific date and percentages used. The only thing I suggest is adding possibilities as to why the phrases increased or decreased more. You did a really good job comparing the phrases of the n-gram and relating them back to the change in language, as well as mentioning a theory. You stated ‘the change in usage of these three phrases’ and how they can be defined by ‘William Labov’s Substratum Theory’. Your ending paragraph was great as it once again showed you knowledge of the language feature of text A. I would give you 4 marks for the AO2 level. You had effective expression and a very good use of vocabulary. All of your content was relevant and developed in an effective manner. You also clearly demonstrated a detailed understanding of, and effective reference to, linguistic issues and concepts. Therefore, I will be giving you 4 marks for the AO4 level. For the AO5 level, I will give you 10 marks. I think you had a really effective and appropriate selection of language data from all three sources, as well as a detailed analysis. Overall, I will give you 18 marks.

    ReplyDelete
  2. For AO2, I would give you four marks. You had effective expressions and your content was relevant with clearly developed ideas. You had few to no grammatical errors with did not impede the communication. You wrote effective, creative, and appropriate pieces for a range of audiences and purposes.

    For AO4, I would give you three marks. You had a clear understanding of the texts and had appropriate references to linguistic issues, concepts, methods, and approaches. You demonstrated a good understanding of the linguistic content used.

    “Being that Text A is a collection of letters written by Berens to his nephew, it shows language change simply because of the form of the text being a letter. Letters are not used as often today due to technological advances that have been made since then, which shows an example of how the English language has changed over time,” here you show the language changes taken place in text A.” A couple of semantic changes can be seen throughout Text A. For instance, Edward Berens utilizes the word inmates to refer to people living in the same home,” you also included semantic changes in the text.

    It can be said that the change in usage of these three phrases over time can be defined by William Labov’s Substratum Theory. Labov’s theory suggests that language changes due to spreading and the influence of other Englishes. It can be inferred that are apt to be likely originated in European English where it then spread and led to the now often used tend to be instead,” here you included William Labov’s Substratum Theory.

    For AO5, I would give you twelve marks. You supplied us with an effective and appropriate selection of language data from all three sources as well as a synthesis of evidence. Each analysis was detailed and effective.

    “Similar to Text A, the collocate chart shows data taken within the current modern English period.”, “Once again, similar to Texts A and B, the n-gram highlights data that is within the current modern English language period.”, and “It should also be noted that Text A demonstrates grammatical and syntactical features that were prevalent during the time in which it was written.” Throughout those sentences you included information from all three texts, comparing and examining their language changes.

    19/25 - Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Hor!

    I feel that overall you did a good job analyzing the letter!
    Your intro states the time period and type of english, which is very beneficial to state initially. The only critique I have with your intro is the sentence structure of your first sentence. I feel that it could have been separated, to get your point across better. With your next paragraph, I found your analysis of “inmates” to be very interesting, as I analyzed the same word. I thought that it worked out very well that your analysis of “inmates” directly led to your analysis of the word “intimate”. You were then able to connect this all back to it being broadening. With this, I would have added a small definition of broadening, to better explain why the terms are considered broadening. With your next paragraph I feel that you missed the opportunity to use great buzz words. When you are writing about a “negative connotation” and “positive connotation”, you could have used the buzzwords 'pejoration’ and ‘amelioration’. Finally, I felt that your analysis for text C was very brief. You did mention what your directly saw, but you didn’t connect it back to any theories until the very end of your paragraph. This should have been the main focus of your paragraph.

    AO2: 3/5
    AO4: 2/5
    AO5: 8/15
    Total 13/25

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts